Equitable Distribution in Tampa
Equitable distribution refers to the way that spouses in Florida divide their property and debts in a divorce. The court divides all marital property in an equitable fashion unless agreed to otherwise by the divorcing spouses. The courts consider equitable to be what is fair, and not necessarily equal. A spouse may receive between one-thirds and two-thirds of the marital property. A court’s analysis of a fair and equitable award will focus almost exclusively on the economic conditions of the parties at the time of divorce to determine what division of resources is fair. A court might consider: the length of the marriage; a spouse’s contribution as a homemaker; the parties’ relative earning capacities; consideration of one spouse’s absence from the job market; a spouse’s contribution to the other’s education or earning ability; the spouses’ respective financial needs, especially considering parenting duties; or the relative health of the parties and or disability of a party. Because Florida follows equitable distribution laws, it is not a community property state.
Equitable Distribution Solutions
Open Palm Law will fight for your marital assets to be distributed as equitably as possible. Open Palm attorneys understand important arguments regarding what property should be considered non-marital and those that are marital. They work to stay apprised of new case law regarding equitable distribution.
FAQs for Equitable Distribution
“Joryn was simply amazing. Her supporting, consistent, honest, and most importantly – productive – approach was exactly what I needed to get through the process. A court trial was imminent if we did not have a successful mediation (the third one!), and no other attorney was able to focus the entire team like Joryn.”Danielle, January 2016
TRIAL ATTORNEY, COLLABORATIVE ATTORNEY
Open Palm in Tampa, Florida is proud to present our firm’s founder, Joryn Jenkins. Please take a moment to read about her qualifications to assist you. We also invite you to view her resume.
In the beginning, Ms. Jenkins worked for one of the ten largest law firms in the country in its Washington, D.C. office. After nearly three years practicing in all aspects of regulatory law, she took a break from big firm life to work exclusively for one of her own clients on a class action involving more than fifty sex discrimination claims in California. When she returned to the East Coast, she accepted an offer from the state attorney in Tampa, E.J. Salcines (now an appellate judge). CONTINUE READING…